Product Spec
Spaceship Study — Competitive Analysis for Pulse
Date: 2026-08-31 · Author: Min · Source: spaceship.com.au (home, US Investing, Learn)
Young's directive: "Pulse is offering service similar to Spaceship, study more from them."
Spaceship Study — Competitive Analysis for Pulse
Date: 2026-08-31 · Author: Min · Source: spaceship.com.au (home, US Investing, Learn) Young's directive: "Pulse is offering service similar to Spaceship, study more from them."
What Spaceship is
Retail investing app for young Australians (200k+ users): managed portfolios (Voyager), US stocks/ETFs with fractional shares from A$10, super fund, first-home saver, and a content/education arm ("Learn").
Their product anatomy (what maps to Pulse)
| Spaceship | What it does | Pulse equivalent / opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| Voyager portfolios | 5 managed thematic portfolios, no minimum, round-ups + auto-invest plans | Paper portfolios (live now, spec v1) — later: curated "Pulse Portfolios" (Uranium Core, Data Centre Materials...) as premium research bundles |
| US Investing | Fractional shares from A$10, hundreds of ETFs/stocks, AUD-denominated, one monthly fee = unlimited trades | We don't broker. But Eva's OpenD lane + paper trading mirrors the UX: trade box on stock pages, AUD view, unlimited paper trades |
| ETF Spotlight / "invest your way" | Discovery: popular lists, themed bundles | Our Market Scan + MA50 signals + uranium theme pages — extend into "Theme Spotlights" (curated lists per sector) |
| Learn (content arm) | Articles: Personal Finance / Real Money Talk / Stocks / Investing, author bylines, read-time labels | Our Special Reports (weekly/monthly) + Eve's Corner + podcast — same shape, we're stronger on daily+voice. Adopt: category labels + read-time + author bylines on articles |
| Testimonials | User quotes front page | Social proof later when we have account holders |
| Simple fee story | "One monthly fee, unlimited trades" | Our membership tiers should be equally simple: Free vs Premium (one price, everything unlocked) |
| Onboarding | "Start in 5 minutes, as little as you like" | Pulse account onboarding should be equally frictionless: email → watchlist → paper portfolio funded with $50k demo cash |
What Pulse already does BETTER than Spaceship
- Daily voice content (podcast + Ask Eve chat) — they have nothing like it
- Live market data on our own pages (stock pages, search, charts) — theirs is app-only
- Desk-grade signals (MA50 crosses, breakouts, 52w proximity) — theirs is passive funds only
- Agent-authored research (team weekly/monthly studies)
What to steal (action items for the fleet)
- "Start in 5 minutes" onboarding — simplify signup → instant paper account (Sol/Nova, membership build)
- Category + read-time + byline on articles — matches their Learn format (Nova, small UI change)
- Theme Spotlights — curated ticker bundles (Uranium Core, Lithium, Rare Earths, Data Centre) as pages — builds directly on our existing universe (Min/Sol)
- Simple one-line fee story on /membership — "One plan, everything unlocked"
- Fractional-style paper amounts — allow small paper buys (already in spec: fractional qty 4dp)
- App-like mobile feel — their whole product is mobile-first; keep our mobile nav work going
Verdict
Spaceship validates Pulse's direction (content + easy investing for Australians) but sits in managed funds; Pulse's edge is research + voice + desk-grade tools. We're not copying their broker model — we're matching their simplicity and content discipline while keeping our differentiators.
Young's Addition — Work-Colleague Beta Testing (anonymous feedback UX)
Directive: Pulse will be shared with Young's work colleagues for testing. They give feedback anonymously.
Feedback UX design (no login, no identifying data)
- Floating "Feedback" button (site-wide, bottom-right) — opens a lightweight form, no auth required
- Collect ONLY: free-text comment + optional 1-tap sentiment (👍/👌/👎) + optional page reference (auto-captured path, stored separately from any identity)
- No emails, no names, no accounts, no cookies for tracking — rate-limit by IP hash (salted, rotated daily) purely for spam control, never stored with the message
- Submission = POST /api/feedback → SQLite table
feedback(id, ts, path, sentiment, comment)— no user linkage column at all - Review surface: a
/admin/feedbackview (auth-gated) showing the raw stream + weekly digest to Telegram - In-context prompts: after 2–3 page visits, a one-time gentle nudge: "Trying Pulse? Tell us what you think — 30 seconds, anonymous."
Offer-design fold-in (from the same directive)
- Position the beta as "Founding feedback" — colleagues shape the product before public launch
- Their most-requested features get prioritised on the public roadmap (visible credit as "suggested by the community")
- Membership pricing anchors off beta feedback: what colleagues valued most becomes the Premium headline feature
Owner: Nova (frontend UX + form) · Ace (endpoint + rate-limit) · Min (digest + Telegram lane) · Mira (pricing signal analysis)